Morbidity of radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy in cervical cancer

dc.contributor.authorNathalia Mora-Soto
dc.contributor.authorCarolina Morante-Caicedo
dc.contributor.authorMaria Caicedo-Martínez
dc.contributor.authorDavid Viveros-Carreño
dc.contributor.authorEmmanuel Sánchez Diaz
dc.contributor.authorJuliana Rodríguez
dc.contributor.authorSantiago Vieira
dc.contributor.authorJonathan A. Peralta
dc.contributor.authorNadeem R. Abu-Rustum
dc.contributor.authorRene Pareja
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-21T17:30:44Z
dc.date.available2026-01-21T17:30:44Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-13
dc.description.abstractCervical cancer is among the most common cancers affecting women worldwide. The standard treatment for early-stage cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] 2018 stages IA1–IB2, IIA1) typically involves a rad ical or simple hysterectomy with lymph node assessment. Postoperative management may include observation or tailored adjuvant therapy, such as radiotherapy or chemo radiotherapy, depending on individual pathological risk factors. However, these inter ventions are associated with significant complications: surgical management can lead to urinary and sexual dysfunction, lymphocysts, and lower limb lymphedema, while radiotherapy may cause genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and sexual toxicities. Less radical surgery for selected cases could reduce surgical morbidity and advances in radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, volumetric mod ulated arc therapy, and other three-dimensional conformal radiation therapies, have the potential to enhance precision and reduce toxicity. Nonetheless, the morbidity associated with combining radical surgery and adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy remains an area of uncertainty, particularly in light of these emerging technologies. Most cur rent data on this topic derive from retrospective studies involving heterogeneous populations and inconsistent quality-of-life assessment methods. Prospective studies employing standardized morbidity assessment tools are essential to determine the true impact of combined treatments compared to single-modality approaches. Future research should prioritize understanding the long-term effects of these treatment strategies, aiming to minimize adverse outcomes while maintaining optimal oncologi cal control.
dc.description.sponsorshipNone
dc.identifier.issn1879-3479
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14595/892
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectadjuvant radiotherapy
dc.subjectcervical cancer
dc.subjectintensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)
dc.subjectlymphedema
dc.subjectpostoperative complications
dc.subjectradical hysterectomy
dc.subjectsexual dysfunction
dc.subjecttreatment morbidity
dc.titleMorbidity of radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy in cervical cancer
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2025- Morbidity of radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy in cervical cancer.pdf
Size:
1.09 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections